The synapsids are a clade of
amniotes that comprise mammals (including us humans), their ancestral
reptilian groups (often incorrectly referred to as ‘mammal-like
reptiles’) and other extinct relatives. Mammals are not descended from
reptiles, but both classes of vertebrate shared a common ancestor. The
synapsids are distinguished by having one temporal fenestra low behind
each orbit in the skull and are the second most diverse clade of amniotes
after the diapsids. The earliest synapsids of all constitute a family known
as the Ophiacodontidae: medium-sized animals that thrived throughout the Late
Carboniferous and Early Permian, which were also some of the largest
terrestrial carnivores at the time.
They were an extraordinary
group with unusually large skulls in proportion to their body size, being very
narrow, high and elongate. Their jaws were densely packed with many small,
sharp teeth that were curved slightly and started to show some differentiation in
size. They also had comparatively short, sturdy limbs as well as very large
pectoral girdles, presumably to provide muscle attachments
for holding up the disproportionately big head.
The undisputed basalmost
ophiacodontid is represented by Archaeothyris florensis (Reisz, 1972)
known from fragmentary material found in Nova Scotia, Canada, dating back to
the late Carboniferous (c. 306 Ma during the Westphalian
stage/Mid Pennsylvanian) and is also the oldest confirmed synapsid. It
resembled a modern lizard to some extent, but already had the high, elongate
skull characteristic of the group. At approximately 0.5 m long, it co-existed
with other primitive reptile taxa like Palaeothyris in swampy forests
consisting of tree-like club mosses (lycopsids)
and ruled by giant arthropods, insects and amphibians. It had strong jaws
equipped with sharp, pointed teeth that were roughly the same shape,
but also possessed an enlarged pair of canines at the front of the maxilla, indicating
a mixed carnivorous diet (van Tuinen & Hadley, 2004).
Figure 1: My reconstruction of
Archaeothyris florensis.
The best-studied and
best-known genus of all is Ophiacodon (Romer, 1925; Romer & Price,
1940), numerous skeletons of which have been found in Early Permian strata from
Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma,
Texas and Utah, so is represented by a thorough fossil record. Six species have
been described (determined by stratigraphic position and size), although it’s
not 100% clear how many of these species are truly valid.
The type species O. mirus
was initially described in 1878 by Othniel Charles Marsh on the basis of some
vertebrae and a mandible during the “Bone Wars”, a
period of intense rivalry between Edward Drinker Cope to discover and name more
new fossil species. Marsh evidently wanted to outcompete Cope, who had an
in-press article naming and describing the reptile, but it was deficient and
written so promptly that the genus Ophiacodon was neglected by the scientific
community for over 3 decades. Meanwhile, Cope published an article shortly
after Marsh published his, describing three new
species in a differently named genus. On the basis of individual vertebrae,
these were named Theropleura retroversa, Theropleura triangulata
and Theropleura uniformis. Later, the holotype specimen of Ophiacodon
was re-examined and a description was made of a brand-new intact skeleton (Williston
& Case, 1913). Even later, Ophiacodon and Theropleura were
revealed to be synonymous, the former which had priority as it was named first,
even though the species names
were still kept (Romer
& Price, 1940).
Figure 2: My reconstruction of Ophiacodon mirus.
These are
the six species of Ophiacodon identified to this day:
O. hilli - known from a partial skeleton found
in Kansas.
O. major - known from incomplete material found
in Texas.
O. mirus - the type species, known from a few
skeletons found in Oklahoma and New Mexico, including one that is almost
complete.
O.
navajonicus - known
from incomplete postcranial remains found in New Mexico.
O. retroversus - known from numerous material found in
Oklahoma and Texas, which includes an almost complete skeleton
O. uniformis - known from a few incomplete skeletons
found in Oklahoma and Texas.
However, it may be that differences in
size (which range from 5 - 10 ft long) only reflect various growth stages instead
of different species (Brinkman, 1988). At first, Ophiacodon was thought
to have been a semi-aquatic predator but is now considered to have been
entirely terrestrial, as recent studies have disproved the alleged aquatic adaptations
that the animal may have had (Felice & Angielczyk, 2014).
There are many other known
ophiacodontids which have been described from relatively incomplete material,
such as the Late Carboniferous taxa Stereorhachis dominans from France
and Echinerpeton intermedium and Clepsydrops sp. from North America, as well as the Early Permian taxa Baldwinonus
trux and Sterophallodon ciscoensis from North America. Protoclepsydrops
haplous (Carrol, 1964), known from Joggins, Nova Scotia, may have been an
ophiacodontid too, preceding even Archaeothyris florensis, but due to
the paucity of fossil material it is hard to know for certain.
One other family of early
carnivorous synapsids appearing in the Late Carboniferous were the even more primitive-looking
varanopids. Like the ophiacodontids, they too had skulls which were narrow,
deep and elongated with the orbits set far back, but had a
more slender mandible with a specialised marginal dentition, as well as some
extended parietal bones on the skull roof above the orbits. (Reisz &
Dilkes, 2003). Other characteristics of the group
also include a covering of extensive dermal osteoderms unlike other clades of
synapsids, which is especially evident in Heleosaurus (Botha-Brink and
Modesto, 2009). The varanopids greatly resembled monitor lizards and like their modern namesake, may have lived similar lifestyles
and ecological niches; they have a stratigraphically wide-ranging, cosmopolitan
distribution extending to the Mid Permian.
The type genus Varanops
brevirostris was as big as a large monitor lizard (at ~ 4 ft long) with
sharp, flattened, strongly-curved teeth, clearly those of a flesh-eating
predator. It is known from a few individuals which include almost complete
skeletons from the Garber Formation of Oklahoma and the Arroyo Formation of
Texas. One of these skeletons even provides evidence of its ecology, where bite
marks along with a tooth stuck between the ulna and
radius shows that the body of this individual was scavenged on by a
dissophoroid temnospondyl amphibian (Reisz & Tsuji, 2006).
Figure 3: My reconstruction of Varanops
brevirostris.
The largest known varanopid of all is
Watongia meieri, which judging from fragmentary remains found at the Chickasha
Formation (Mid Permian in age) of Oklahoma is estimated to be approximately 2 -
2.5 m long, so may have been the apex predator of its time and place. It is
believed to be a varanopid and not a gorgonopsid as first thought, judging from
characteristics such as large, lateral protuberances on the postorbital bone as
well as marginal, backward-curving teeth unserrated on the anterior and
posterior edges. It may also have had a disproportionately large head in comparison to its body (Reisz & Laurin,
2004).
Figure 4: My reconstruction of
Watongia meieri, based on a study by Reisz & Laurin (2004). Note the
bony protuberance on the postorbital (behind the eye).
One of the most primitive varanopids is Mycterosaurus longiceps, a small, agile carnivorous/insectivorous synapsid known from a partial skeleton found at the Waggoner Ranch Formation dating back to the Early Permian (Artinskian). As well as having maxillary teeth distinct from those of other varanopids, it possessed many small palatal teeth too. It also had vertebrae comparable to Varanops: the dorsal neural spine is broad in lateral view, with vertical posterior and anterior edges. The dorsal centra are considerably longer than the lumbar centra (Romer & Price, 1940). In addition, a highly mobile ankle joint present in both Varanops and Mycterosaurus suggests that they had a semi-digitigrade stance.
Figure 5: My reconstruction of
Mycterosaurus longiceps.
References:
Botha-Brink,
J., Modesto, S. P. 2009. Anatomy and relationships of the Middle Permian
varanopid Heleosaurus scholtzi based on a social aggregation from the
Karoo Basin of South Africa. Journal of Vertebrate Palaeontology, 29
(2), 389-400.
Brinkman, D. 1988. Size-independent criteria for
estimating relative age in Ophiacodon and Dimetrodon (Reptilia, Pelycosauria)
from the Admiral and lower Belle Plains formations of west-central Texas. Journal
of Vertebrate Paleontology, 8 (2), 172-180.
Carroll, R. L. 1964. The earliest reptiles. Zoological
Journal of the Linnean Society, 45 (304), 61–83.
Felice, R. N., Angielczyk, K. D. 2014. Was Ophiacodon
(Synapsida, Eupelycosauria) a swimmer? A Test Using Vertebral Dimensions. Early
evolutionary history of the Synapsida, Springer Netherlands, pp.
25-51.
Reisz, R. R. 1972. Pelycosaurian Reptiles from the
Middle Pennsylvanian of North America. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative
Zoology, 144 (2), 27-60.
Reisz, R. R., Dilkes, D. W. 2003. Archaeovenator
hamiltonensis, a new varanopid (Synapsida: Eupelycosauria) from the Upper
Carboniferous of Kansas. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 40 (4),
667-678.
Reisz, R. R., Laurin, M. 2004. A reevaluation of
the enigmatic Permian synapsid Watongia and of its stratigraphic significance.
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 41 (4), 377-386.
Reisz, R. R. Tsuji, L. A. 2006. An articulated
skeleton of Varanops with bite marks: the oldest known evidence of scavenging
among terrestrial vertebrates. Journal of Vertebrate Palaeontology, 26
(4), 1021-1023.
Romer. A, S. 1925. An ophiacodont reptile from the
Permian of Kansas. Journal of Geology, 33 (2), 173-182.
Romer, A. S., Price, L. I. 1940. Review of the
Pelycosauria. Geological Society of America Special Papers, 28,
1-538.
van Tuinen, M., Hadly., E. A. 2004. Error in
estimation of rate and time inferred from the early amniote fossil record and
avian molecular clocks. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 59,
267-276.
Williston, S. W., Case, E. C. 1913. Description of a nearly complete skeleton of Ophiacodon Marsh. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, 181, 37-59.
No comments:
Post a Comment